Alert: Political Correctness Invades IN Govt. ūüė°

Indiana Bureaucrats Bow to the gods of Political Correctness

Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill has once again proved that he is nobody‚Äôs puppet or doormat.¬†¬†¬†In a move that surely sent shock waves through dozens of cubicles in the state office building, AG Hill put the brakes on a politically correct effort to sneak through the creation of¬†transgender or genderless driver’s¬†licenses in Indiana.

In a major story that broke on Monday, Hill refused to sign off on a procedural matter that I‚Äôd suggest most political leaders in his position would have viewed as a mere formality.¬†¬†¬†Hill refused go along with a new rule proposed by the Bureau of Motor Vehicles to allow ‚ÄúGender X‚ÄĚ on Indiana‚Äôs driver licenses citing a lack of public input on the matter.¬†¬†¬†(This will surely cause his office to be the target of a lot of hate by the far left.)

Sources had told me that the BMV wanted this to go into effect without a lot of controversy.   They wanted it to be a done deal behind the scenes by the time the public found out about the formal change.   You may want to call the BMV state office at 888-692-6841 and politely let them know that this is bad policy.   (You can also email the BMV here: https://secure.in.gov/BMV/mybmv/Contact.aspx)

There is a good, well-balanced, news story about this written by Ft. Wayne Journal Gazette reporter Niki Kelly.  You can read it here:  https://www.journalgazette.net/news/local/indiana/20190908/bmv-gender-rule-hits-roadblock

Here is one of my quotes from her article:

The entire discussion hasn’t sat well among socially conservative groups and lawmakers who believe a person should be required to keep the gender assigned at birth on official state documents.

‚ÄúI think a person can appear as they choose, and freely live that lifestyle, but we need their true biological identity from birth on a driver’s license if that document is to have any credibility,‚ÄĚ said Micah Clark, executive director of the American Family Association of Indiana.

‚ÄúOtherwise, why can’t I claim the weight, height and eye color I’ve always wanted? What if a person floats between genders and may appear male one month or female another? I think their official ID should reveal their true biology from birth, not their mental beliefs.‚ÄĚ

Another Study Finds Homosexuality is not Linked to Genes 

A massive new study conducted by Harvard and MIT scientists refutes the commonly held idea that homosexuals are ‚Äúborn that way.‚Ä̬†¬†¬†The study involved nearly half a million people in the US and UK.¬†¬†Published in¬†Science, the journal for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, this is the largest study ever conducted on the subject.

An international team of scientists examined data from 477,522 people to see whether genetic markers in DNA could be linked to sexual behavior.¬†¬†The researchers conducted a ‚Äúgenome-wide association study‚ÄĚ involving anonymous subjects based upon responses to questions about sexual behaviors, sexual attraction, and sexual identity.

Andrea Ganna, the head of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory at the Institute of Molecular Biology in Finland and an instructor at Harvard was the study‚Äôs lead author.¬†¬†She concluded, ‚ÄúThere is no gay gene that determines whether a person has same-sex partners.‚ÄĚ

David Curtis, honorary professor at the UCL Genetics Institute at the University College in London, said, ‚ÄúThis study clearly shows that there is no such thing as a ‚Äėgay gene.‚Äô¬†¬†There is no genetic variant in the population which has any substantial effect on sexual orientation.‚ÄĚ

Another team member, Ben Neale, an associate professor in the Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital said, ‚ÄúThere is no single gay gene . . . It‚Äôs effectively impossible to predict an individual‚Äôs sexual behavior from their genome.‚ÄĚ

The study concluded that homosexual behavior is more strongly linked to outside environmental factors such as family life, friends, beliefs, and childhood development.

Two New Reports on Indiana School Performance 

Only 37% of Indiana’s students in grades 3-through-8 have passed the new statewide I-LEARN test’s math and English sections.  The I-LEARN test is the replacement for the I-STEP test given to Indiana public school students for more than two decades.  In the last year of the I-STEP nearly 60% of students passed the math section and nearly two-thirds passed the English section.

Many state education leaders had warned that test scores would likely drop with the transition to a new test, though I’d bet that many were surprised at such a large decline.

I served on the Governor’s Education Roundtable under Governors O’Bannon and Kernan, and on an I-Step review panel years ago. I believe that it is possible that there might be some problems with this new test.  If so, those problems will rise up through feedback from teachers and other testing and academic leaders.

Governor Holcomb and the Superintendent of Public Instruction have stated that these new test results will not be used to grade schools this year.

Perhaps a better overview came this week from one of the nation‚Äôs foremost school publications¬†Education Week.¬†¬†A national ranking called ‚ÄúQuality Counts 2019‚ÄĚ is this publication‚Äôs 23rdannual ranking of state education systems.

The report looked at nearly two-dozen factors such as kindergarten enrollment, 4th grade reading tests, 8th grade math tests, high school graduation rates, school funding, parental employment and income.

Indiana ranked 22nd among the 50 states and DC. Indiana schools were given a C grade.  No state received above a B+ grade. Forty-four states had a C or lower.

         Education Week’s annual report card has been static for years.  They bemoan the overall difficulty of improving schools in their report.  Indiana looks fairly similar in most categories to the national average.  (Our 4th and 8th grade tests are actually higher than the national average at 40.7 vs 35.4 in 4thgrade reading and 37.8 vs 33.4 in 8th grade mathematics.)

In Their Own Words:

Without a firm moral foundation,¬†freedom degenerates quickly¬†into¬†anarchy.¬†¬†Then there will be freedom only for those who are stronger and more unscrupulous than the rank and file of the people.” ¬†– President Harry Truman, April 3, 1951

Just the Facts:

AFA-IN Fact Sheet: Are People Born Gay?
Click here: https://tinyurl.com/y4prqdmg

Share
Tweet
Forward

Help us Defend Faith, Family
and Freedom in 2019!

There are 2 ways to support AFA of Indiana:

Send a check or money order to: AFA of Indiana P.O. Box 40307 Indianapolis, IN 46240

OR Make a secure donation at https://afain.net/donation

Copyright © 2019 AFA of Indiana, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because you opted in on our website or at one of our events.

Our mailing address is:
AFA of Indiana

PO Box 40307

Indianapolis, IN 46240-0307

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

AFA-IN: Blaming Indiana; Polling Accuracy; New Dating Trends

More than Replacing the Landline Phone

Years ago, one might have assumed that new technology would simply replace the home telephone as a primary means of communication between the sexes.  For decades the stereotypical teenager spent hours on the family phone talking to a boyfriend or girlfriend while the parents worried about their phone bill or their own missed calls.

However, not only has technology changed communication, it has also changed how couples meet and date.

According to a new study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.  Michael Rosenfeld, of Stanford University, compared the results of surveys conducted in 2009 and 2017, using them to track the ways people met their partners against the years in which the meetings took place.

The research found that online dating is going through the roof while the more traditional ways people meet are on the decline.

As the Institute for Family Studies observed, ‚ÄúIt used to be that technology just helped us communicate more efficiently with our preexisting acquaintances, family, and coworkers. Now it helps us find and connect romantically with total strangers.¬†In the 2017 survey, 90% of those who started their relationships online had no other connections to each other. Increasingly, it‚Äôs not our friends, siblings, and churches that serve as mediators between us and potential partners; apps and websites and their algorithms do.‚ÄĚ

Research on this phenomenon is new and sparse and therefore may not yet be conclusive.¬†However, a 2013 study, found that ‚Äúmarriages that began on-line, when compared with those that began through traditional off-line venues, were slightly less likely to result in a marital break-up (separation or divorce) and were associated with slightly higher marital satisfaction among those respondents who remained married.‚ÄĚ A¬†2017 studysimilarly found that ‚Äúmeeting online does not predict couple breakup.‚Ä̬†¬†It also found that marriages occur quicker through online dating services.

Blaming Us for Your Problems

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot lashed out at Texas Senator Ted Cruz yesterday in a twitter fight after Cruz noted that twice as many people were shot in Chicago (41) over the weekend as in the mass shooting in Texas (22).   The Mayor blamed the city’s decades old crime problem on . . . (brace yourself) . . . Indiana!

‚ÄúThe windy city‚ÄĚ has some of the strictest gun laws in America.¬†¬†The mayor blamed Indiana because 20% of the illegal guns in her city come from Indiana.¬†She blamed us because we, ‚Äúdo not have common sense gun laws‚ÄĚ (as, I guess, Chicago does?)

Yet, if Mayor Lightfoot is correct, if it is a matter of gun laws, why doesn’t Indiana have the renowned crime problems that Chicago has had for so long? Between 2015 and 2017 there were 1,996 homicides in Chicago, a city of 2.7 million people.  There were 1,325 homicides in the entire state of Indiana over those same three years. There are 6.6 million Hoosiers.

A Few Considerations Regarding Presidential Polling

You have probably heard that President Trump is losing in polling to nearly every major Democratic presidential candidate. Political polling a year ahead of the presidential election may have some momentary political implications, or derision against President Trump, but in reality, they are worthless as any kind of prediction tool.

In January of 1980, Jimmy Carter was leading Ronald Reagan 62% to 33%.   Reagan won in November by 10 points.   In December of 1983, Ronald Reagan led Walter Mondale by only 1 point.  On Election Day, Reagan won by 18 points. In May of 1988 Michael Dukakis led George H.W. Bush by 12 points.  On Election Day, Bush won by 6 points.   In March of 1992, George H.W. Bush led Bill Clinton by 19 points.  On Election Day he lost to Clinton by 6 points.  In March of 2004, John Kerry led George W. Bush by 6 points.  On Election Day, Kerry lost by 3 points.

Last week¬†Reuters/Ipsos released a poll¬†showing President Trump with a job approval of just 42%.¬†¬†At first glance, this is not a bad number considering the media’s constant attacks on the President.

Reuters numbers are actually lower than the political reality.¬†¬†¬†The poll is made up of registered voters, but such polls are usually an under-representation.¬†¬†‚ÄúLikely voters‚ÄĚ is a more accurate prediction of election outcomes.¬†¬†Under those polling samples, Trump‚Äôs numbers tend to increase about 5%.

Reuters gave the Democrats 95 more survey responses than Republicans, weighting Democrats as 47% of the poll sample, compared to 38% Republicans.  This is a lopsided weighting in favor of the Democrats, giving them a 9-point advantage. In the most recent 2018 election, exit polls found that 37% of voters described themselves as Democrats and 33% as Republicans, which is only a 4-point advantage.

While President Trump could lose in the November 2020 election, any polling this far out is not a reliable predictor of this.

In Their Own Words:

‚ÄúPeople almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.‚ÄĚ
¬†¬†–¬†Blaise Pascal, French mathematician and physicist.

Just the Facts

Next week I will add a new section to this weekly email called ‚ÄúJust the Facts‚ÄĚ where I will pass along a web site link to one of our one-page ‚Äúfact sheets‚ÄĚ we have created on various issues over the years.

Share
Tweet
Forward

Help us Defend Faith, Family
and Freedom in 2019!

There are 2 ways to support AFA of Indiana:

Send a check or money order to: AFA of Indiana P.O. Box 40307 Indianapolis, IN 46240

OR Make a secure donation at https://afain.net/donation

Copyright © 2019 AFA of Indiana, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because you opted in on our website or at one of our events.

Our mailing address is:
AFA of Indiana

PO Box 40307

Indianapolis, IN 46240-0307

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?

AFA-IN: Was America Built on Slavery? Congressional Race Update

Media Effort Distorts True History of America

The¬†New York Times¬†has embarked on an effort to rewrite the history of the United States as a nation built upon slavery.¬†¬†Calling it the ‚Äú1619 Project,‚ÄĚ the opening article is a whopping 7,600-word effort to look at 18th Century history through a liberal 21stcentury lens.¬†¬†Joshua Lawson has written an excellent rebuttal to this effort in¬†The Federalist.¬†¬†Because much of the NYT‚Äôs ideology is already being inserted into the narrative of schools and universities, I wanted to pass along some portions of this important article for your consideration.

No, America Wasn’t Built On Slavery, But Faith That All Men Are Created Equal

The year 1619 was chosen for the Times‚Äô ‚Äúre-founding‚ÄĚ to mark when the first slaves arrived in the English settlement of Jamestown.

Slavery was a heart-wrenching, obstacle during America’s birth, but by no objective analysis was it the central factor of the founding as the 1619 Project claims.

Slavery was and is an abomination. It is an evil part of America‚Äôs past‚ÄĒas well as that of nearly every nation on earth. The fact that slavery has a universal heritage does not absolve American slave owners, but it does provide a necessary historical context.

During the 17th century, slavery was, sadly, an accepted part of life throughout the world. By A.D. 1619, slavery had existed for more than 5000 years, dating back at least to Mesopotamia.

Written by Nikole Hannah-Jones, the 7,600-word¬†flagship essay¬†of the 1619 Project asserts that ‚Äúour democracy‚Äôs founding ideals were false when they were written.‚Ä̬†¬†¬†Hannah-Jones claims, ‚Äúwhite men who drafted those words did not believe them to be true for the hundreds of thousands of black people in their midst.‚ÄĚ She provides no evidence or examples for this sweeping assertion.¬†

Jefferson’s original final draft of the Declaration explicitly referred to black slaves not as property but as men.    Letters written to John Jay show Alexander Hamilton hoping the Revolutionary War could lead to the emancipation of blacks and appraising them equal to whites in their abilities. Additional examples are plentiful.

The Founders were painfully aware of the cognitive dissonance of forming a nation under the proclamation that all were created equal while maintaining slavery. They also had to face the political reality that the 13 colonies could not be united in a new nation if they immediately abolished slavery.

With no other way to obtain the necessary support for unity and ratification, the Founders spitefully tolerated slavery’s existence, while also placing it on a path to extinction. Once the nation secured independence, American statesman of the Founding Era slashed away at slavery as quickly as prudence and political reality would allow.

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 prohibited slavery in the territory that would become the states of Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and Wisconsin. In 1794, Congress barred American ships from engaging in the slave trade. Additional legislation in 1780 banned Americans from employment or investment in the international slave trade. Finally, the U.S. Congress officially banned the importation of slaves beginning on January 1, 1808, the earliest date allowed under the deal made to ratify the Constitution.

Far from the bastion of racism, hate and pro-slavery sentiment that the 1619 Project portrays, much of the United States was ahead of the world in ending the horror of slavery.  Shortly after the signing of the Declaration, northern states took the lead. By 1804, New York, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania had passed laws that immediately or gradually abolished slavery.

If the American Founding was grounded in slavery, and the Founders didn’t believe a word of the opening of the Declaration, how does one account for these actions?

According to Hannah-Jones, one of the ‚Äúprimary reasons‚ÄĚ Americans declared independence was to preserve slavery, fearful of the ‚Äúgrowing calls‚ÄĚ to abolish the slave trade in London. However, a closer look shows the abolitionist movement didn‚Äôt have a truly organized presence in England¬†until 1783¬†when the first petition was filed by Quakers. It wasn‚Äôt¬†until 1787¬†that the influential Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade was founded.

The 1619 Project is politically driven 2020 posturing dressed in the veneer of a historical ‚Äúexpos√©.‚ÄĚ By warping history, it hopes that dopamine hits of anger and injustice will prevent readers from engaging in objective analysis.¬†Just in time to paint America as racist for the upcoming presidential election.

Leftists are banking that the outrage caused by the 1619 Project will provide them the political capital required to move to the next stage: a full reconfiguration of America into their image.

America does not need further tribal rhetoric tearing up what little societal cohesion remains. The nation certainly doesn’t benefit from Times writers conducting a growing chorus of anger and grievance.

Bryan Duncan In Concert

Dove and Grammy Award winning Christian artist, Bryan Duncan, is appearing in Noblesville on September 28that First Presbyterian Church.  As you may know, we have hosted Bryan for two Christmas concerts in Central and Northwest Indiana.  Proceeds of this concert go to help with addiction ministries in Hamilton County.

Bryan is an incredible talent, and a blessing to see in concert. His dozen #1 hits include: Love Me With Your Life, A Heart Like Mine, Step by Step,¬†Love Takes Time,¬†Traces of Heaven,¬†You Don’t Leave Me Lonely, and Into My Heart.¬†¬†You may want to learn more and purchase tickets here:¬†https://www.fpc-noblesville.org

And Now There Are Three

Former State Representative Steve Braun has officially announced that he is running for the Republican nomination for the 5th Congressional district being vacated by Susan Brooks.¬†Braun ran for Congress the last election cycle, but lost, many believe, due to a mail hit piece that foolishly used the term ‚Äúarm and a leg‚ÄĚ against then State Rep. Jim Baird, who lost his left arm in Viet Nam in 1971.¬†¬†Baird is now the 4th District Congressman.

Braun is a formidable candidate if for no other reason than being the brother of US Senator Mike Braun and having the ability to self-fund a lot of his campaign.

Last night, a reported with WTHR tweeted that Indiana State Treasurer Kelly Mitchell will announce her entrance into the race.

Micah Beckwith, a small businessman and pastor at Northview Church is the only other candidate on the Republican side to have announced.  Beckwith recently had over 250 people at his kick-off announcement diner featuring former Congressman Marlin Stutzman. Other possible names include former State Sen Mike Delph, and State Sen. John Ruckelshaus.

In Their Own Words:

‚ÄúA new philosophy generally means in practice the praise of some old vice.‚ÄĚ ‚Äď G.K. Chesterton

Share
Tweet
Forward

Help us Defend Faith, Family
and Freedom in 2019!

There are 2 ways to support AFA of Indiana:

Send a check or money order to: AFA of Indiana P.O. Box 40307 Indianapolis, IN 46240

OR Make a secure donation at https://afain.net/donation

Copyright © 2019 AFA of Indiana, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because you opted in on our website or at one of our events.

Our mailing address is:
AFA of Indiana

PO Box 40307

Indianapolis, IN 46240-0307

Add us to your address book

AFAIN: Dating in Church? & Local Govt. Alert

Protecting Faith-Based Organizations 

The Trump Administration is proposing a much-needed new rule through the U.S. Department of Labor that ensures that conscience and religious freedom are protected allowing groups that contract with the government to have employment policies that are consistent with their beliefs.   Liberals have wanted to force religious colleges, businesses, and charities that work with the government to embrace the LGBT agenda.  This proposed rule nixes that effort at the federal level.

No Datable Men in Churches

My wife and I met at a Christian ministry for singles hosted by a large church in Indianapolis.  One thing that we have noticed over the years is that after 20 years of marriage we still have several friends who are single.   I have found myself sometimes suggesting that they need to be in church to find a good wife.   After, all, it worked for me.  Yet, a new study finds that my assumptions may be wrong.  (There are, of course, many better reasons to go to church! )

We have all heard that there is a dearth of men in churches when it comes to male and female ratios.  Books have been written for ministry leaders about this problem.  However, a new paper from the Institute for Family Studies finds that, while there are ratio differences, when it comes to marriage availability, the problem is different.

If you Google statistics on men in the church, the main number you will find is that 61% of the people in church on a Sunday are female. But when that number is restricted to prime-age, unmarried people, it turns out that it’s more like 52-57% of people who identify as Christian are female, which is considerably less severe than the perception.

The real problem is not so much that there is a mismatch between the numbers of men and women.  The problem is that the portion of the church population of young unmarrieds is noticeably small. Churches are only useful places to meet a spouse if there are a lot of young people there.

The paper looks at various denominational types from conservative evangelicals, to Catholics, to mainlines, to historically black churches.¬†To show the small demographics of young people, the average Mainline church has about 80 attendees on a Sunday. Of those, about 11 are likely to be under 50, not married, and not divorced. Of those 11, six or seven are likely to be women; let’s call it seven, as we stipulated that the scenario centers around a woman. That means there are seven eligible women and 4 eligible men.

This is not a functional dating pool. So, it’s no wonder the share of Americans who meet their partner at church has plummeted from 12% in 1940 to barely 4% today.

A Sad Public Incident

You may have read that State Representative Dan Forestal was arrested for drunk driving, resisting arrest and impersonating an officer, which is a felony allegation.   This week the case was referred to a special prosecutor because the Democrat lawmaker has made campaign donations to Marion County Prosecutor Terry Curry and served in his campaign.

It is unknown at this point what may happen to the legislator.  Indiana law states that a felon cannot hold public office. Forestal allegedly used his firefighter badge to claim he was a police officer while looking for cocaine with some patrons at an Indianapolis bar.  If that charge is prosecuted and sentenced, it seems highly unlikely that he could hold on to his position in the legislature.

The Indianapolis Fire Department has suspended Forestal, who serves on the department.¬†¬†His resume says he is a lieutenant, but IFD says he is only a private in the department.¬†In 2007 Forestal was arrested on DUI and promised the department that ‚Äúnothing like this will ever happen again.‚ÄĚ

Rep. Forestal has been very hostile to religious freedom as a state legislator, but he could really use a lot a prayer at this time.

ALERT:  Protecting the City of Fort Wayne

Last week, I sat through a four-hour city council meeting in Fort Wayne.  Discussion surrounded two proposals dealing with sexually oriented businesses.  The council cast a tie vote on an ordinance banning live sex acts in businesses.  That proposal died.  They did move an update of their 2001 ordinance on adult book stores and strip clubs on for a final vote.

Over the last forty years there have been numerous studies, finding that sexually oriented businesses often lead to increased crime and lower property values.   These findings are so consistent that courts across the nation, including the US Supreme Court, have allowed local governments to pass regulations and zoning guidelines as a means of reducing the harmful secondary effects of such establishments.

The ordinance would help protect dancers from being groped by customers.  It would also reduce the possibility of prostitution and sex trafficking occurring inside these clubs.  The ordinance gives the city and law enforcement agencies better guidelines should any clubs violate certain basic standards of business operation.

Dozens of cities and counties in Indiana already have an ordinance like the one being considered in Fort Wayne.

If you live in Fort Wayne, the council members need to hear from you before their final vote on Ordinance: 19-07-35.

Please email the following Council members, simply asking them to vote ‚Äúyes‚ÄĚ for the sexually oriented businesses ordinance:

Jason Arp    jasonarpcitycouncil@gmail.com

Michael Barranda    michaelbarranda@gmail.com

Dr. John Crawford   jncrawfordmd@gmail.com

Thomas Didier    tdidiers5@frontier.com

Paul Ensley  paul@paulensley.com

Tom Friestoffer   freistrofferatlarge@gmail.com

Glynn Hines   glynnhines@aol.com

Russ Jehl    russ@russjehl.com

Geoffrey Paddock   geoffreypaddock@aol.com

In Their Own Words:

“Without virtue there can be no liberty.” – Dr. Benjamin Rush, Signer of the Declaration

Share
Tweet
Forward

Help us Defend Faith, Family
and Freedom in 2019!

There are 2 ways to support AFA of Indiana:

Send a check or money order to: AFA of Indiana P.O. Box 40307 Indianapolis, IN 46240

OR Make a secure donation at https://afain.net/donation

Copyright © 2019 AFA of Indiana, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because you opted in on our website or at one of our events.

Our mailing address is:
AFA of Indiana

PO Box 40307

Indianapolis, IN 46240-0307

Add us to your address book

AFAIN: Lonely Millennials, Abortion Pill Risks, No Shaving

Do You Have Any Real Friends?

In light of the tragic shootings in Ohio and Texas, some observers have pointed to the isolation that seems to be a common trait in the young men who commit these horrible crimes.  (There is an excellent article on the likely connection between the breakdown of the family, divorce, and fatherlessness as a common thread in mass shooters that is well worth reading. We have posted it on our web site here:  https://www.afain.net/2019/08/guns-are-not-the-ultimate-cause-of-mass-killings/)

According to a new survey, millennials who are active social media users may be the loneliest generation that America has ever observed.  The poll of 1,254 adults aged 18 and older has found that a startling 27% of millennials have no close friends.  This contrasts with only 9% of Baby Boomers and 15% of GenXers report having no friends. (The study did not include the younger Gen Z.)

Not surprisingly a full third of young people ages 20-30 report feeling lonely ‚Äúoften‚ÄĚ or ‚Äúalways.‚Ä̬†¬†¬†On the positive side, 49% of millennials said that they had between one and four ‚Äúclose friends‚ÄĚ and 70% said that they have a best friend. However, based upon the other stats the researchers note that their best friend is possibly their only friend.¬†¬†The survey found that across the board a third of all Americans feel making friends is difficult.

There are several studies which have found that a significant degree of social media use can increase both loneliness and depression.

New Study Finds Harm in Abortion Drugs

In recent years, abortion procedures have somewhat moved away from a surgical process to more women using pills to produce an abortion.   Testimony from women who have obtained chemical abortions tends to confirm that abortion-minded women believe that taking a pill is an easier route than an invasive procedure.

They may also have been led to believe that taking a pill has fewer side effects, but that is questionable.¬†¬†One can see how a woman in crisis might believe that simply taking a few pills will make her ‚Äúproblem‚ÄĚ go away. Yet, I have heard testimony from women at the Indiana statehouse describing what happened, which could only be termed as gruesome.

Now a¬†new study¬†published in the journal¬†Frontiers in Neuroscience¬†provides additional evidence of the harmful biological and behavioral effects of drug-induced abortion.¬†¬†Using rat subjects, the study ‚Äústrongly suggest that pregnancy termination induces significant negative biological and behavioral changes in the rat.‚ÄĚ The study found that drug-induced abortion presented more negative effects than a spontaneous abortion through miscarriage. The three-year study indicates that there are negative consequences such as depression, anxiety, loss of appetite and decreased self-care after terminating a viable pregnancy using mifepristone and misoprostol.

You may have the same question I did regarding a study using rats being connected to humans. Dr. Stephen Sammut, a neuroscientist and psychology professor who led the research, explained that rats are commonly used in these types of studies because of their similarities in physiology and neurophysiology to humans.

Swinging Single Advocate Admits to Being ‚ÄúTruly Alone‚ÄĚ

The six-year TV series in the late 90’s and early 2000’s, called Sex in the City may have glamorized the lives of single women, but its originator has now admitted that the trailblazing legacy it promoted brought her deep loneliness in real life.

Candace Bushnell, who wrote the original 1997 novel that spawned the successful HBO series, recently told the¬†Sunday Times¬†magazine that she regrets not having a family.¬†¬†Bushnell, now 60, said, ‚ÄúWhen I was in my 30‚Äôs and 40‚Äôs I didn‚Äôt think about it. . . then when I got divorced and I was in my 50‚Äôs, I started to see the impact of not having children and truly being alone. I see that people with children have an anchor in a way that people who have no kids don‚Äôt.‚ÄĚ

Bushnell divorced in 2012 after 10 years of marriage.¬†She is preparing to release a new book titled, ‚ÄúIs There Still Sex in the City?‚Ä̬†¬†The book deals with what she describes as middle-aged sadness and other obstacles many single women face as they turn 50.

Her new novel follows a group of middle-aged New York City women who travel to the Hamptons for a fresh start, much like she has done in real life. ‚ÄúWe‚Äôre all single women without children. And you think about, what are you going to do when you get old? If you don‚Äôt have kids, you realize, ‚ÄėWho is going to take care of me? Your girlfriends?‚Äô‚ÄĚ

A Close Shave?  Not Hardly

One would have to question the financial wisdom a business leader who appears comfortable with offending customers, but that’s exactly the response the CFO of the Gillette shaving company had to some bad news.  After a string of offensive advertisements attacking manhood and promoting a leftist agenda with a commercial of a father showing his trans-daughter how to shave her face, Gillette has now lost over $8 billion in revenue.

The Procter & Gamble owned company claimed that this loss was not due to it’s political lurch, but rather to more men growing beards.  Externally, Gillette is ignoring groups like our national office, which called for people to buy something other than Gillette for their shaving needs.  It would seem that a huge number of Americans have left Gillette.

Did You Watch It?

We have released our new AFA-IN promotional videoabout who we are and what we do. If you have not viewed it yet, take a look here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfszHZtuJ60&feature=youtu.be

In Their Own Words:

“To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society.”¬†¬†– Theodore Roosevelt

Share
Tweet
Forward

Help us Defend Faith, Family
and Freedom in 2019!

There are 2 ways to support AFA of Indiana:

Send a check or money order to: AFA of Indiana P.O. Box 40307 Indianapolis, IN 46240

OR Make a secure donation at https://afain.net/donation

Copyright © 2019 AFA of Indiana, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because you opted in on our website or at one of our events.

Our mailing address is:
AFA of Indiana

PO Box 40307

Indianapolis, IN 46240-0307

Add us to your address book

Important Announcement from the Marion County Republican Chairman

Dear Indy Republicans,
On January 8th¬†of this year I was fortunate to have been elected¬†to serve¬†as your Marion County GOP Chairman.¬† As you all know, the Marion County Republican Party is incredibly important to me.¬† The Marion County GOP brought me to Indianapolis ‚Äď under former Chair Tom John in 2008.¬† Over more than a decade I have worked alongside you and we‚Äôve built incredible relationships.

 

On that Tuesday night at Dallara, I envisioned my tenure with Marion County being measured in years, not months.¬† The lobby was filled with hundreds of passionate and dedicated volunteers who represent what is great about organizations ‚Äď political or otherwise.¬† I was and remain humbled by the support shown by each of you and have always viewed that trust as a blessing.

 

Fast forward seven months and I am pleased with where we are.¬† We’ve built a strong and experienced team of candidates poised to reclaim the top offices in our county and return Indianapolis to a city of solutions, not just questions.¬† We have a terrific team of Township Chairmen focused on strengthening each township and supporting candidates at every level. Our new Executive Director brings great knowledge and relationships to our team and is committed to supporting candidates and volunteers.¬† We have incorporated new and more effective technologies to maximize the time of each and every volunteer.¬† Last but not least, we have the support of a generous and diverse donor network that sees the opportunities that lie ahead and believes in our mission and our plan.

 

As much as I value my role as Chairman, I’ve been presented with a professional opportunity that will demand more of my time, and will unfortunately leave me less time to focus on my duties to our party. Therefore, with a heavy heart, I will be resigning as Chairman of the Marion County Republican Central Committee effective July 30.

 

This is not a decision that has been made quickly or easily.  This decision does not change my belief in or my commitment to our Party.  I am confident that we will elect a new chair who will keep our commitment to strengthening our grassroots network, ensure our candidates represent the people of their districts and will deliver every technological and tactical advantage to our team.

 

We will be successful this November and will build upon that momentum in 2020.

Sincerely,
Bryce Carpenter
Chairman, Marion County GOP

Copyright © 2019 Marion County Republican Central Committee, All rights reserved.
Signed up to receive Party emails.

Our mailing address is:
Marion County Republican Central Committee

101 W. Ohio Street

Suite 2200

Indianapolis, IN 46204

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

AFAIN: Alert Dangerous Bill in Senate; IN House Race Update

Let Indiana’s Senators Know that Religious Discrimination is Wrong

The US Senate may soon¬†consider a misnamed bill called the ‚ÄúEquality Act.‚ÄĚ ¬†This¬†dangerous legislation has already been passed by the US House.¬†¬†It has 45 co-sponsors in the US¬†Senate. ¬†It only needs 51 votes to pass.

My¬†national office has reviewed this legislation and warned that, ‚ÄúThe¬†deceptive Equality Act is a religious liberty wrecking ball.‚ÄĚ

It would be hard to imagine a more anti-freedom bill than this one. This legislation would allow the government to discriminate against people of faith, ignoring the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, and forcing people to violate their consciences or face the full weight of government punishment.

Here are¬†just¬†a few of the many problems the ‚ÄúEquality Act‚ÄĚ could cause¬†if¬†enacted:

  • It would force¬†many faith-based organizations to pay for abortion in their health care¬†plans by creating a right to demand abortion coverage from health care¬†providers.

 

  • ¬†It could force¬†Christian schools, ministries, and churches to change employment¬†policies that are currently aligned with traditional teachings on sex,¬†gender, marriage and human sexuality.

 

  • ¬†It would harm¬†faith-based charities, such as adoption agencies, that believe in¬†natural marriage and strive to place foster or adoptive children with a¬†mother and father.

 

  • ¬† It would¬†embolden those in Indiana who have been attempting to harm our school¬†voucher system by targeting Christian schools that have employment¬†policies consistent with their¬†religious beliefs on sexual morality.

 

  • ¬†It could threaten the privacy and safety of women and¬†children by forcing genderless bathrooms and showers upon sporting¬†facilities, parks, rest areas and other public amenities.

 

  • ¬† It could force schools to allow biological males to¬†compete in girls’ sports if those males claim gender confusion or have¬†a gender identity disorder.

Indiana Senators Todd Young and¬†Mike Braun need to hear from you. ¬† Ask them to¬†protect religious freedom by voting ‚ÄúNo‚ÄĚ on the so-called ‚ÄúEquality¬†Act.‚ÄĚ

Senator Todd Young
(202) 224-5623
E-mail:  www.young.senate.gov/contact

Senator Mike Braun
(202) 224-4814
E-mail: www.braun.senate.gov/contact-mike

Retirement Announcement Shakes Up Indiana Politics

As you probably know, 5th District Congresswoman Susan Brooks has announced that she will not run for re-election next year.   This district covers northern Marion County and includes all of Hamilton, Tipton, Madison and Grant counties, and parts of Blackford, Howard and Boone Counties.

The district, long held by¬†conservative leader Dan Burton, has shifted a lot with the changing¬†demographics of Marion and Hamilton Counties.¬†¬†In terms of voters, the district is¬†about¬†75% urban or heavily suburban and 25% rural.¬†¬†Rep. Brooks won this district with¬†only 55% in her last run.¬†¬†Democrat Joe Donnelly won this district, though not his race for¬†Senate.¬† ¬†It¬†is still a district¬†that though perhaps not ranked ‚Äúsolid Republican‚ÄĚ anymore, strongly¬†leans Republican.

I almost never do this, but I am going to list names I have heard considering running, along with my comment, as a descriptor, not an endorsement for or against any candidate.  There may be other names yet to emerge and some I mention here may or may not ultimately run.  This will be an expensive and heated race.

The only name I have heard mentioned on the Democrat side is speculative.  It is former Indiana state representative Christina Hale.  She could potentially be a strong candidate for the Democrats.

On the Republican side there are many people reportedly considering a run.   In no particular order, here are some of those names.

Former State Senator, and soon to be promoted to Lieutenant Colonel in the US Army, Mike Delph, has been a personal friend of mine for two decades going back to when he was Chief of Staff for Dan Burton.   Mike would likely have very strong support among the conservative base of the GOP.  Mike has state, congressional, and military experience that could appeal to many GOP voters throughout the district.

Current state Senator John Ruckleshaus is another name being mentioned.  I’ve known him for years in the legislature.   He would seem to have support among the establishment GOP.  I use that term in a positive way.  John is a standard, rank and file moderate Republican with what I would consider to be both good and bad votes cast.  For many politicians with this description, this would mean that neither the left nor the right would like him, but I don’t sense this with Ruckleshaus.  He is a very likeable person.  I am not sure how to assess his strengths.  It may depend upon how he is defined in this race by himself or by his opponents.

I met Micah Beckwith a few weeks ago, before Brooks’ announcement.  He was considering challenging Brooks due to a series of liberal votes she has accumulated. Micah is an energetic outsider who serves as a worship leader on staff at Northview Church, the largest Church in Hamilton County.  He may have the hardest path as a dark horse candidate without any political office in his resume, but he is certainly very capable of making an impact on this race.

Former Indianapolis mayor¬†Greg¬†Ballard would seemingly have a strong base in the Marion County portion¬†of the district and name ID that stretches into Hamilton County. Also,¬†if¬†there is a Susan Collins or Jeff Flake wing of the GOP here, Ballard¬†could own it.¬†¬†The Republican candidates I¬†have mentioned so far all pass the litmus test of being pro-life.¬†Ballard may not meet that criteria. Ideologically, Ballard would seem¬†to appeal to those uncomfortable with Trump and the more liberal wing¬†of the GOP. . . but that doesn’t mean that he cannot win in a¬†crowded¬†field in the May primary.

Another name I have heard, but not seen in the news yet, is Kelly Mitchell.  She might have a big chunk of the structured party support given her position as the current Indiana State Treasurer.  Her position on issues before the US Congress are mostly unknown.

I have also heard that the Congresswoman’s Chief of Staff is interested in running.  I believe that is still Megan Savage who has served Chief of Staff since 2015 and as a deputy prosecutor in Marion County prior to this position.  She would seem to naturally inherit some of Brooks base of support, if she runs.

In Their Own Words:

¬†‚ÄúYou can’t have¬†a limited government if the family breaks down.‚Ä̬†¬†‚Äď Former Pennsylvania Senator and¬†Presidential candidate Rick Santorum

Share
Tweet
Forward

Help us Defend Faith, Family
and Freedom in 2019!

There are 2 ways to support AFA of Indiana:

Send a check or money order to: AFA of Indiana P.O. Box 40307 Indianapolis, IN 46240

OR Make a secure donation at https://afain.net/donation

Copyright © 2019 AFA of Indiana, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because you opted in on our website or at one of our events.

Our mailing address is:
AFA of Indiana

PO Box 40307

Indianapolis, IN 46240-0307

Add us to your address book

AFA-IN: New Polling on Religious Freedom, IN Abortion law Ruling

What Do Americans Think of Religious Freedom and the Constitution?

Last week, I mentioned an extensive new poll conducted by the Barna polling firm. I noted the hostility liberals have toward religious freedom and Christianity that was revealed repeatedly in the poll.

Barna’s poll involved over 70 questions covering constitutional terms, and phrases, religious terms, and feelings regarding monuments and public displays of religious content.

Every three years I have surveyed AFA of Indiana donors to see how we are doing as a policy organization and advocate.   The results have been fairly consistent, but in the last two surveys the top issue of concern switched from abortion to religious freedom.  For this reason, Barna’s new research is of particular interest to me.

I have been digging into seven components of the study and over 30 pages of results and conclusions.  Here are some of the findings of this unique national survey of US adults.

There is some significant ignorance of the U.S. Constitution that mirrors the media and cultural narrative in some ways.¬†¬†(The younger the person, the less knowledge they have.)¬†¬†For example, a high percentage of Americans (38%), did not know that the term ‚Äúseparation of church and state‚ÄĚ does not appear anywhere in our founding document.

On a more positive note, nearly eight out of ten (77%) said the following statement is true:¬†¬†‚ÄúThe U.S. Constitution gives American citizens the freedom to experience and express their faith without government interference of any kind.‚ÄĚ

Seventy-five percent agreed with this statement:¬†¬†‚ÄúThe Founding Fathers never intended for anything in the U.S. Constitution to hinder the free practice, expression, or experience of religion.‚ÄĚ

Eight out of ten (81%) agreed with:¬†‚ÄúThe sections of the U.S. Constitution regarding religion are meant to promote religious freedom, not to create religious penalties and punishments.‚Ä̬†¬†

The survey also tested reactions to twenty religious and historic terms.  The responses by demographics and ideological differences was often interesting.   Four of the terms had very strong positive responses in which ideological differences had the smallest gap.

Liberty 83%
Freedom 80%
Religious Freedom 78%
Free Exercise of Religion 76%

Other terms’ responses also received positive reactions such as:

War Heroes 73%
Jesus Christ  72%
Faith 72%
One Nation Under God  72%
In God We Trust  69%   (our national motto)

The most ideological polarizing words and phrases were ‚ÄúChristian‚ÄĚ which had a 39-point positive response difference between conservatives and liberals, ‚Äúmilitary‚ÄĚ (33-point gap), ‚Äúfaith‚ÄĚ (32-point gap), ‚ÄúJesus Christ‚ÄĚ (30-point gap), ‚ÄúFounding Fathers‚ÄĚ (28-point gap) and ‚Äúreligion‚ÄĚ (26-point gap).

Here are some of those specific wide differences in positive response:

Conservative                 Liberal

Christian             77%                    38%
Religion               67%                    41%
In God we trust    83%                    49%
Military                83%                    50%
Religious Liberty   69%                    54%
Founding Fathers  86%                    58%

In contrast, the terms ‚Äúseparation of church and state‚ÄĚ and ‚Äúhumanist‚ÄĚ were embraced by most liberals, but were rejected by a majority of conservatives as well as¬†moderates.

Many cultural observers have noted the lack of faith among Millennials.¬†¬†The words and phrases that particularly bother this young demographic are ‚Äúatheist‚ÄĚ (although they had the most positive rating of any generation for that word), ‚ÄúChristian‚ÄĚ (only 48% see this term positively), ‚Äúconstitutional‚ÄĚ, ‚Äúmilitary‚ÄĚ, ‚ÄúFounding Fathers‚ÄĚ, ‚Äúhumanist‚ÄĚ, and ‚Äúin God we trust.‚ÄĚ

The term ‚Äúsecularism‚ÄĚ and ‚Äúatheist‚ÄĚ had the most negative response across all demographic generations, with both terms receiving below 30% positive reactions.

Next week, I will reveal what Americans think of monuments and public displays with religious content, as well as religious speech, behavior and patriotic displays in the public square.  I will also include survey results to questions about public controversy and views on legal attempts to remove such things.

Indiana Law Goes Before the U.S. Supreme Court

As you may have heard, yesterday the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a ruling on an Indiana abortion law that AFA-IN supported in 2016.  The justices overturned a 7thCircuit ruling blocking a law allowing for the humane disposal, burial or cremation of an aborted child.

Largely unreported in this story was the background testimony before the Indiana General Assembly about local abortion clinics simply pouring the remains of children down drains or throwing them in the trash.

Senator Liz Brown noted,¬†‚ÄúThis law creates rules for how to appropriately dispose of aborted fetal remains.¬†Establishing standards brings respect to the woman, abortion staff and the aborted child. These standards require the facility to dispose of the baby‚Äôs remains properly, unless the woman chooses to bury her baby.‚ÄĚ

The law was also passed in response to reports of Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, selling aborted baby parts.

The Court recognized that this law in no way hinders a woman‚Äôs ‚Äúright‚ÄĚ to abortion, which explains the strong 7-2 ruling.

However, that also explains why the court also let stand a ruling blocking another law (over the strong objection of Justice Clarence Thomas) that AFA-IN also supported.¬†¬†That law prohibited abortion for the reason of a child‚Äôs race, sex, skin color or fetal abnormality such as Down Syndrome.¬†¬†¬†One analyst described this as ‚Äúa lethal discrimination.‚ÄĚ

It seems clear that the court has no interest in chipping away at Roe v. Wade right now.  In my view, those hoping that the Supreme Court will overturn Roe  when ruling on Alabama’s law or several other states are going to be disappointed.  I suspect, based upon yesterday’s actions, they will let lower court rulings blocking these states stand, thereby punting on the question.

However, it is still possible that the court could revisit this question of discrimination or the use of abortion as a method of eugenics ‚Äď giving birth only to a specific type of child based upon certain desired characteristics.

In Their Own Words:

‚ÄúThis law and other laws like it promote a State‚Äôs compelling interest in preventing abortion from becoming a tool of modern-day eugenics . . . Although the Court declines to wade into these issues today, we cannot avoid them forever. Having created the constitutional right to an abortion, this Court is dutybound to address its scope.‚Ä̬†¬†– Justice Clarence Thomas,¬†Box v. Planned Parenthood,¬†May 28, 2019

Share
Tweet
Forward

Help us Defend Faith, Family
and Freedom in 2019!

There are 2 ways to support AFA of Indiana:

Send a check or money order to: AFA of Indiana P.O. Box 40307 Indianapolis, IN 46240

OR Make a secure donation at https://afain.net/donation

Copyright © 2019 AFA of Indiana, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because you opted in on our website or at one of our events.

Our mailing address is:
AFA of Indiana

PO Box 40307

Indianapolis, IN 46240-0307

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

AFA-IN Vote on In-Equality, Middle Class Mobility, Divorce & Men

US House Passes Dangerous In-Equality Act 

As you know, on Friday the US House of Representatives passed H.R. 5 on a vote of 236 to 173.   Every Democrat supported the bill that would punish people of faith who do not bow to the politics of the LGBT movement.    Eight Republican members voted for this legislation, including Indiana Congresswoman Susan Brooks.

Among other things, H.R. 5 would undermine many legal precedents and exclusions including the Hobby Lobby decision that protected businesses from having to pay for abortion in their health care plans.  H.R. 5 would also force businesses to pay for gender reassignment services in health care plans.   It would also impact Christian school and college employment policies regarding human sexuality.  It would implement affirmative action policies for those who identify as homosexual or transgender.  H.R. 5 would also turn many school sports programs upside down by allowing biological males to compete in women’s sporting events and to use their locker rooms and showers.

The bill was so extreme and punitive that even some supporters of the LGBT movement opposed the bill.¬†¬†¬†University of Virginia law professor, Douglas Laycock, a supporter of same-sex marriage, told¬†National Review¬†that H.R. 5 would ‚Äúcrush‚ÄĚ conscientious objectors. He explained its sinister nature in this way:

‚ÄúIt goes very far to stamp out religious exemptions. . . It regulates religious non-profits, and then it says that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act does not apply to any claim under the Equality Act.¬†¬†This would be the first time Congress has limited the reach of RFRA.¬†¬†This is not a good faith attempt to reconcile competing interests.¬†¬†It is an attempt by one side to grab all the disputed territory and to crush the other side.‚ÄĚ

Not a single Democrat anywhere in the US House stood up for religious freedom in this vote.¬†¬†Indiana Congressman Peter Visclosky, a co-sponsor of the legislation, told those who called his office that he supported H.R. 5 because he ‚Äúis strongly opposed to all forms of discrimination.‚Ä̬†¬†¬†Of course, that is a total lie¬†since H.R. 5 blatantly discriminates against millions of people of faith and any ministries, charities,¬†non-profits or businesses run by them.

This confirms a new poll from George Barna on religious freedom which finds deep animosity toward faith, particularly toward Christians, among liberals.¬†¬†When asked about 20 different religious terms liberals had the most visceral negative reaction to the term ‚ÄúChristianity‚ÄĚ and the one of the most positive reactions to the term ‚Äúhumanist.‚Ä̬† ¬†¬†Only 38% view the term Christian positively, compared to 77% of those identifying as conservative.¬†¬†That was the largest gap (39 points) among the differing¬†worldviews¬†in the ‚Äúterms perceived as positive by respondent‚Äôs ideology‚ÄĚ segment of the poll.

Hopefully the Senate leadership will reject even considering H.R. 5 as a viable bill.   President Trump has expressed his opposition to the bill, but we will need to be ready to contact Indiana Senators Young and Braun about this legislation.

An Underreported Story of Racial Stereotypes

Some recent Census Bureau data may surprise some who have a certain view of African-American males that is often upheld in the media and pop culture.  Today, more than one-in-two black males in America (57%) have made it into the middle class or higher as adults.  This is up from just 38% in 1960.  The share of black men who are poor has fallen from 41% in 1960 to 18% today.

While economic employment is a key to this success, there are other factors that are often overlooked.   Marriage is one of those keys. Seventy percent of married black men are in the middle class, compared to only 20% of never-married black men. Church is another factor.  Black men who frequently attended church services at a young age are more likely to reach the middle class or higher when they are in their fifties: 53% of those men who attended church as young men made it to that level, compared to 43% who did not.   Military service has a positive impact too. Black men who served in the military are more likely to be in the middle class when they reach mid-life (54% vs. 45%) than those who did not serve.

As for the criminal justice system and black males, only 28% of black men who had contact with the criminal justice system when they were young have moved into the middle or upper class, whereas 52% of black men who had no contact with the criminal justice system at a younger age were in the middle class or higher.

In short, a very significant portion of black men in America are realizing the American Dream, most are not in poverty.  As with all demographic groups, marriage and faith are positive components.

Divorce Hurts . . . Men Too

Many years ago, I wrote an extensive report on the subject of divorce titled ‚ÄúShattered Dreams.‚Ä̬†¬†¬†I can remember¬†after it‚Äôs release¬†spending several hours with a radio show host named Mike Pence discussing the research included in the nearly 40-page booklet.

Even in the 1990s there was a mountain of research on the societal costs of divorce and the impact of no-fault laws.    The impact upon women, men and children has been well documented over the last forty years.   Divorce often leads to negative economic harms for women and educational harms for children.  We have all heard many of those studies and statistics.

A study from Binghampton University in New York looks at an often overlooked negative outcome for men.   The study finds that while many women get hurt and recover, many men get hurt in a divorce and never recover.     The study finds that while women may hurt more emotionally at the time of the breakup, men tend to regret divorce more than women do, and they take much longer to recover.  Some never fully recover, they simply move on.

Most divorces are filed by women. It is likely that women are more divorce minded and farther down the emotional road than the man who may be surprised by the disruption or the sudden reality of the dissolution of the marriage.

One theory is that divorce is a bigger blow to a man’s ego of which his relationship status plays a part as the relationship initiator, breadwinner, etc.  Another theory is that women tend to have a larger emotional support group than their husband and thus they may bounce back faster or better because of this.

Obviously, this study involving 5,705 participants in 96 countries is a general finding.  Many people, male or female, recover from divorce. Yet, it is hard to argue that in most cases, particularly when there is no physical violence involved, easy divorce has been a good thing for society.

In Their Own Words:

“Turning a blind eye to evil, however, doesn‚Äôt make it disappear. It allows it to grow. And those who allow evil to grow in order to protect their own convenience will be held accountable for the end results of the evil they facilitate.‚Ä̬†— Ben Shapiro

Share
Tweet
Forward

Help us Defend Faith, Family
and Freedom in 2019!

There are 2 ways to support AFA of Indiana:

Send a check or money order to: AFA of Indiana P.O. Box 40307 Indianapolis, IN 46240

OR Make a secure donation at https://afain.net/donation

Copyright © 2019 AFA of Indiana, All rights reserved.

You are receiving this email because you opted in on our website or at one of our events.

Our mailing address is:
AFA of Indiana

PO Box 40307

Indianapolis, IN 46240-0307

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?